Photomatix Pro 5 Review

Photomatix 5 review

I’m a little overdue with this review but it’s given me a little more time to play.

In November, HDRsoft released Photomatix Pro 5, which contains one of the most important upgrades since changes to it’s De-Ghosting way back when.

It’s no secret that since the release of Nik Software’s HDR Efex Pro 2, I’ve used that for the majority of my HDR Image Processing. I found it was able to accomplish a more natural look easily and of course that’s the look I prefer. However Nik had some serious side effects, the worst of which, its alignment and Chromatic Aberration control. And while it’s de-ghosting was very good; it just didn’t have the power or the versatility of Photomatix Pro.

I would, on some difficult images, use the superior alignment capabilities of Photomatix to create a 32Bit Radiance file and then open that in HDR Efex Pro 2 to do my tone mapping. But with Nik acquisition by Google, I truly doubt that there will be any further releases or significant Updates to HDR Efex Pro 2 or any of Nik’s other software. Which IS very good but without support, I don’t see much future.

So I was glad when HDRsoft released version 5 for Photomatix Pro because maybe, just maybe I could return to what I started with so many years ago.

What’s New

The New changes include:

  • New interface with a kinda iPhone white/light gray look. It also lets you choose a Unified or Floating window, never really liked the floating window but TEHO
  • New De-ghosting Interfaces and capabilities which now open in a new window and allow you to choose both the reference image and also strength. The selective de-ghosting still remains another optionDeGhosting Dialog
  • The Ability to use the “Fusion” method on a single image
  • A new Fusion Method which is called Real Estate to work with images shot with interiors and windows open to outdoor light to better blend those two scenes
  • Some changes to the batching process so that you can now add presets at this stage
  • The option to return to the Processing window if you wish to reprocess the image with different settings and not have to go through the merge routine again (except with Lightroom workflow)PMP Merge Dialog
  • Improvements and a slight change to the Alignment options, one for Tripod, one for Hand Held, which is nice to see as sometimes with a tripod used the alignment tries too hard and overdoes it, and with handheld, some don’t do enough
  • Then there are some Bug fixes and some changes to control names which is a welcome change since they now describe much better their function 

But the last and biggest improvement (IMO) is the addition of a new Tone-Mapping Method called “Contrast Optimizer” which is said to offer a more natural look to your HDR images. So let’s test that part out and see

Giving it a Go

So I went through and found a difficult image. This desert Image was shot just as the sun set but the mountain was high enough to still be illuminated by the sun and also the moon was just rising at this point. The moon is always a tough target for HDR since it is a moving object, especially if some of your exposures are long. So this is a test of the new tone mapping plus a good chance to see if the De-Ghosting is as good as ever and hopefully even better.

The image was shot on a tripod and consisted of 6 exposures shot with 1EV spacing. 24mm Wide Angles lens, f/16 and exposures ranged from 1/2 second to 15 seconds. I shot at a tight aperture not so much for DOF, because I had no close subjects, but instead to try and get some star effects on the moon. With the 24mm I wouldn’t get much detail in the moon but also because I was shooting towards a mountain, the moon was fairly high and bright in the sky already and not at optimum Moon conditions (just above the horizon).

I started in Lightroom and just set and synced the White balance for all 6 exposures.   Then it was off to “Export to Photomatix Pro”

The missing dialog box

One  thing curiously … or maybe not so curiously missing in PMP 5; in the merge dialog box  when coming out of Lightroom, there is no box to check for ‘Show  32Bit intermediate image” like there was in PMP 4. I say not too curiously because HDRsoft now has a “Merge to 32 Bit” Plug-in for Lightroom. This is for those of you that want to use the power of Photomatix Pro’s Merge function but want to instead do all your tone-mapping inside of Lightroom since, as of Lightroom 4.1 and later, it now has the ability to work on 32 bit Floating Bit Tiff Images ( no support for Radiance or OpenEXR)

Let me just take a second to clear up a myth about 32Bit Files and Lightroom. Somehow people have got it into their head that the only program that does 32 Bit HDR processing is Lightroom/ACR. No. All Programs: Photomatix Pro, HDR Efex Pro 2, Oloneo all work with a merged 32 Bit file. The only thing new is that Lightroom can now open a 32 Bit Tiff file…sorry, that’s it. Nothing else to see here, move along.

OK back to what I was saying about the loss of the ability to stop and save a 32 Bit File in PMP 5. Of course it is because they want to sell the Lightroom Plug-In. But it’s not missing altogether. If you use Photomatix Pro as a standalone, in the “Load Bracketed Images” stage there is a check box to stop at the 32 bit image. The workaround for Lightroom is to output 16 Bit tiffs and then load THOSE into the Standalone, save as a 32 bit Tiff and then Tone map in Lightroom. 32 Bit Merge dialog

Back to business

The Image aligned and de-ghosted perfectly in Photomatix and now it was on to trying the new Contrast Optimizer.

It’s a simple Module with controls for:

  • Strength
  • Tone Compression
  • Lighting effect
  • White Clip
  • Black Clip
  • Midtone
  • Color Saturation
  • Color Temperature 

The main controls are the first three:

  • Strength controls the Micro Contrast so it shows more or less detail
  • Tone Compression is the range between Highlight and Shadow and the Output Dynamic Range
  • Lighting effect adjust the balance between Highlight and Shadow 

The rest are pretty self explanatory. I like that there aren’t a lot of controls so that people looking for a natural look have less chance of getting into trouble. But of course it’s not as powerful as the Detail Enhancer but then again that gets many people into trouble with Halos, Burnt Edges and Noise Nasties.

I REALLY Liked using  Contrast Optimizer, It got me the look I like quickly and easily and left me a good image to work with in my post work, which I believe is half the whole look to my image. But I need something solid to work with to start

Here are 5 Images for comparison using different methods and programs. I didn’t try to match the looks of each process but just kinda of went for the closest to a natural look. I didn’t go through hours trying to get the ultimate image out of any but went through to get a great basis for post work.

Image Results

First off is Photomatix Pro 5 Contrast Optimizer

Photomatix Pro 5 Contrast Optimise

Photomatix Pro 5 Contrast Optimize

What I like about this image is just its overall natural look and I love the balance between the foreground which was fairly dim at the time shot and the mountainPeaks. The Sky is VERY naturally colored and super smooth in gradation . I like the Moon but there are a few aberration that can be fixed in post. There is good detail in the mountain without getting scary detail. It’s smooth and natural. For me, this is the best image 

Next up is Photomatix Pro 5 with Detail Enhancer

Photomatix Pro 5 Detail Enhancer

Photomatix Pro 5 Detail Enhancer

To me this is the reason I jumped ship on Photomatix. I don’t like the “Glowy” look that leads to a lack of detail and then you end up pushing the detail up which messes with the grunge. Also the sky at times gets a weird un-natural too blue to it which I’m not crazy about and many times on a Photomatix image I would replace skies because it bothered me so. Also the image is flat and doesn’t have the Output Dynamic range that I feel is necessary and instead becomes a Low DynamicRange image. It’s not bad, but there is better.

The Third image is done with Photomatix Fusion Natural

Photomatix Pro 5 Fusion Natural

Photomatix Pro 5 Fusion Natural

This image is the Detail King but maybe too much as it starts to get a bit crispy. The blue sky looks a little bit funky and takes on an greenish tinge but maybe the image is a bit flat in its transition from the mountain to foreground. I do like this image but I can see it being image dependent. But it’s nice to have choices all in one program.

The 4th image was done with Nik by Google HDR Efex Pro 2. The image was also merged in HEP2

Nik HDR Efex Pro 2

Nik HDR Efex Pro 2

While I like the detail in the mountain and its transition to the foreground is good, I really like this part of the image.  The thing that kills this image for me is the sky; it’s Blotchy and not well gradated. The Moon has been well de-ghosted. It also the noisiest which has been a bane of HEP2, Luckily Nik makes great noise reduction in Dfine 2. I still like HDR Efex Pro2 but it certainly is not my instant go to any more

And the final 5th image was made by exporting 6 16 Bit tiff images from Lightroom, Merged with the Standalone PMP5 to a 32 Bit file and then re-imported into Lightroom to use it’s develop module. Note I used only the Basic Module in the tone mapping to keep it on par with the other programs which really aren’t designed for Finish processing per say.

Lightroom 32 Bit

Lightroom 32 Bit

This quite honestly is a very good image, I think it ties the Photomatix  Contrast Optimizer image in natural and good quality The mountain looks very good, the sky is without noise and  well gradated. There  is again a bit of some aberration in the moon which, again, can be fixed….So what’s not to like? Here’s my problem,. This is all Lightroom had, this is balls to the walls controls maxed out. If I wanted  more I could not get it. I could not get more compression if I tried. So while Lightroom is very powerful with single images, it’s not the most so with HDR. Of course we could go further with the 16 bit afterwards but I just feel it has it’s limits. That not to say that this may not fit you perfectly. It’s just not going to fit everyone perfectly

I didn’t get a chance to try the Fusion/Real Estate settings but my good friend in Florida that shoots a lot of Real Estate gave it thumbs up on how it handled window light

So what’s my final verdict? I think Photomatix has once again put itself on top. Besides it excellent merge function now you have plenty of options on processing and tone-mapping. So much so, that regardless of your taste in HDR, it is now possible with Photomatix Pro 5. With that said: Highly Recommended

This is the finalized fully post processed Photomatix Pro 5 Contrast Optimizer image

Photomatix Detail Optimizer Final Image

Photomatix Contrast Optimizer Final Image

If you bought Photomatix Pro 4 you can upgrade to 5 for Free, If you purchased earlier versions and have gotten all the free upgrades through 4, you will have to pay for this upgrade but it’s only $29 and well worth it when I consider all the upgrades I have gotten for free since 2006. If you don’t have Photomatix, the full pro version is $99 and there are other versions available as well as full function trials. They also have the Merge to 32 Bit Lightroom Plug-in available for $29

If you click the link below and enter Promo Code: theHDRimage you will get 15% off the purchase price

Hope that helps,







  1. Russ January 7, 2014 at 11:23 pm #

    Hi, Peter, LATE!!! But have a good year for 2014.
    I asked the question to HDRSOFT concerning the withdrawl of the function to show the 32 bit intermediary radiance file around four/five weeks ago and the reply from them “Hi Russ, This option shouldn’t be needed when using Photomatix via Lightroom, in fact, and is not part of the normal HDR workflow, which is why we removed it in the new plugin’s version.”
    I used it many times as always thought that SNS-HDR along with a couple of other HDR programs gave a better realistic result in fact I wish that Pebal would get the new version of SNS-HDR out as it’s been promised for some time now and IMO does give excellent realism in the final output.
    Thanks for the tip on on saving the 16 bit TIFFs will have a look at that one.

  2. Peter January 8, 2014 at 12:16 am #

    Hi Russ,
    Happy New Year to you too.
    I’m not really sure I understand the answer they gave you. It’s kinda like then why ever offer it because it5’s not a normal function of MOST people HDR processing…BUT, we do use it. I means there are other ways to get a 32 Bit file but that was an easy way…maybe that should be the next article. Thanks again for the comment!

  3. Jacob April 25, 2014 at 5:28 am #

    Hi Peter,

    Very nice tutorial. I’m trying to do selective HDR on a sunset image. What I need is to “merge” 2 different settings of the HDR, one for the sun and sky and the other for the sea. Do you know if it’s possible in Photomatix or to I need to move to more labor intensive work in photoshop?



    • Peter April 25, 2014 at 7:23 am #

      Hi Jacob,
      Unfortunately no, Photomatix really isn’t equipped for that. I have tried taking the tow images and then merging them again and it just ends up with a mishmash of the two and then double processing on top of that.

      But I do do this quite a bit and I do it in Photoshop with tow layers and then layer masks.
      My usual workflow is to select both processed images in Lightroom and then say >Edit In> Photoshop> Open as layers. Or if you just have Photoshop you can open both images and then select and copy and paste one on top of each other

      If I have a very distinct line between line and sea I will use the smart selection and select the sky and then hit the Layer Mask button, you may have to hold down Alt when doing that depending on which layer you want to mask or is on top.

      If it more detailed then I just set a white layer mask on the top layer and paint with black for what I want to show thorough from the bottom layer or use a shade of gray or vary the opacity of the brush to blend the two layers.
      Sorry there wasn’t a quicker and easier way, especially of you don’t have Photoshop

      • Jacob May 1, 2014 at 10:49 am #

        Thanks Peter

        I saw that doing it with a gradient mask is a better way in many cases, but it seems that the localized control of hdrefex gives me better results,

        I with photomatix had the ability to selectively manipulate the image parameters based on color/light/intensity…

  4. Michael Lutz July 30, 2014 at 4:37 am #

    Peter, are you still of the opinion that Google will not be making any more significant updates to NIK software and specifically to NIK HDR Efex Pro 2.0?

    I have been reading the web about this and have been reading the release notes for NIK plugins. NIK engineers seem to be releasing fixes and enhancements much faster for NIK that I see for Photomatix.

    I am wondering what your opinion is now. Thanks so much!

    • Peter July 30, 2014 at 9:11 am #

      Hi Mike!
      I guess my best answer is: I don’t know
      I can only give my opinion of what “I think”
      I was surprised that there was a new version of Analog Effects released earlier this year but I don’t think that’s a very intensive engineer piece either and it was mearly updated with new filters and textire overlays
      They are still selling the software so they do need an engineer staff to handle bugs and to also make sure it is compatible with new software. i.e Photoshop CC , CC2014, LR5 etc
      They have released all of their Educational staff and most (if not all) of their Marketing staff for the software. I would ask those people but they are bound by CAs.
      My personal opinion is that Google is not in a position that they really care about selling software but rather needed it to support their core market which is: Information. The more people post Photos to Google the more information they have. So giving them Online tools via Google + and Picasa Web Albums will make it easier for people to post to the web and in easily edited forms. And especially for Mobile via Nik’s Snapseed application. I think that is why they wanted Nik.(Looking at Instagram’s huge surge)
      So will there be new releases…I guess it certainly is possible
      For me, I would be highly surprised
      But the software is still available, works fine and is very nicely priced and still used by many. Looking forward, I see other companies being more inovative

  5. Albert F Schwartz Jr December 30, 2016 at 3:03 pm #

    I now have Photomatix PRO 3. Are there any advantages in upgrading to PRO 5 or 6.
    Please let me know what they are.
    Thank you.

    • Peter December 30, 2016 at 4:27 pm #

      Hi Albert,
      Trying to think Back to 3 as I no longer have a copy on my computer,

      But best recollection is, That in 4 there was better de=ghosting tools, such as the selective de-ghosting.

      in 5, brought The “Contrast Optimizer” Tone mapping module and also an Interior preset for Fusion mapping. along with advances in “Previewing” (faster) and of course more RAW support if used as a standalone . And a few interface updates.

      If you shoot Real Estate, the Interior Fusion is very useful. The contrast Optimizer can give a more natural look to Landscapes.

      Depends if you are satisfied with what you have.

      If you do decided to upgrade, there is a coupon code for 15% off on my site

      Thanks for the good question


  6. Gert Engman January 10, 2017 at 1:25 pm #

    Have you tried the new version om Aurora PRO 2017? In includes the possibility to add luminosity masks which seems to be quite helpful.


Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *